California Supreme Court Endorses Key Proposition 66 Reform

One of the key reforms in Proposition 66 is a requirement that one of a death row inmate’s challenges to his conviction and sentence be assigned to the original trial judge.  The challenge in question is called “habeas corpus” and is separate from the appeal on the trial record, which will continue to go to the state supreme court.

Today, the California Supreme Court, quoting an earlier Court of Appeal ruling, said, “When the judge assigned to examine and rule on the habeas corpus petition is the same judge who presided at the petitioner’s criminal trial, ‘there is no judge better suited for making a determination of the issues raised in [the] petitioner‟s petition’ ….”  This statement appears in today’s unanimous ruling in Maas v. Superior Court, S225109, a case concerning when a habeas corpus petitioner may challenge the assigned judge.

Read Original Article